moonchildg13 wrote: I'm sorry...did not know or I would have suggested that. Thinking I had missed something I've gone back and watched again. Still there is a two hour difference in what Chaffin said and what the 911 Director said. I'm sure channel 9 will run it again. So far I"ve heard that Chaffin has or did change is story to the GBI 5-6 times. We can spectulate that Sam did something to her but the evidence so far is just not adding up. The State will now need more than Chaffin and the dog. 8/19/2009 5:02 PM EDT on NewsChannel9.com
advocatusdiabol wrote: Oh, I don't watch videos I have to read -- I am legally deaf. 8/19/2009 4:40 PM EDT on NewsChannel9.com
advocatusdiabol wrote: Well it was said that the guy has changed his story. If David Dunn is still with the defense, I trust he will get down to the truth. 8/19/2009 4:39 PM EDT on NewsChannel9.com
moonchildg13 wrote: LOL... but I'm missing something on this. ON day 2, Chaffin said Sam called him at approx 4am that morning and said that he had shot Ms.Parker or something to that nature. But today the Director of the 911 center, Ms. Parker's boss, received a call from Ms Parker around 6am. That he missed the call and tried to call her back but was sent to VM. What am I missing here?
Advocateusdiabol, watch the video of day 2 then watch the video from this morning. What am I missing? There is a two hour difference from what Chaffin said and from what the 911 Director said. 8/19/2009 3:45 PM EDT on NewsChannel9.com
advocatusdiabol wrote: See they don't seem to need some doggie witness to get somewhere with this case. 8/19/2009 1:34 PM EDT
I was wondering about the time of the phone call to Chaffin & then the later call from Theresa's cell phone too but....the call from Theresa's cell phone could have been placed by accident by Sam Parker and not Theresa, especially if it was the last dialed call from her phone. I've dialed people before like that plenty of times.
I don't see how anyone with a fair thinking mind can look at the evidence and say it doesn't add up that sam did something to her. I wonder if the comments were by relatives of sam.
I don't see how anyone could not come to the conclusion he's guilty either.....the mere fact that he says he was at the house that morning AND her 4-Runner was there when he was there tells me enough because you have 2 police officers testifying that her 4-Runner WAS NOT THERE and that his truck was there......to me, that says volumes and proves he's lying & was gone in her 4-Runner. The rest of the evidence just adds to the suspicions & ties things up but that one fact alone does it for me. I just hope they do the right thing on this one because I don't want to see him walk free on this.